Category: Corporations Subject: Multiple Corporations Title: Controlled Groups IRC Sections: 1561, 1563, and 179 Filename: 1083.html Date Produced: 7/97 Copyright 1998, The Tax Resource Group. All rights reserved. Telephone
800-578-3498. Internet: www.taxresourcegroup.com Background The taxpayer, BN, owns 100% of the stock of Corporations A and B. BN's adult children own 100% of the stock of
Corporations C and D. Corporation F is wholly owned by the adult child
of BN's second wife (i.e., BN is not the father). Various limitations are placed upon the tax
benefits available through multiple, commonly controlled corporations. These
rules are found at IRC Sections 1561, 1563, and 179(d)(6). There may be
other such rules elsewhere, but these are the ones you mentioned. The various
limitations are applicable if two or more corporations are considered part
of the same controlled group. Issues 1. Are Corporations A, B, C, and D part of the same controlled group for
purposes of IRC Sections 1561, 1563, and 179? 2. Are Corporations A, B, and F part of the
same controlled group for purposes of IRC Sections 1561, 1563, and 179? Answers 1. Corporations A, B, C, and D are not part of the same controlled group
for purposes of IRC Sections 1561, 1563, and 179. 2. Corporations A, B, and F are not part of
the same controlled group for purposes of IRC Sections 1561, 1563, and 179. Discussion Under IRC Section 1563(a)(2), two corporations belong to the same controlled
group for purposes of IRC Section 1561 if ... 5 or fewer persons who are individuals, estates,
or trusts own (within the meaning of subsection (d)(2)) stock possessing
-- (A) at least 80 percent of the total combined
voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or at least 80 percent
of the total value of shares of all classes of the stock of each corporation,
and (B) more than 50 percent of the total combined
voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or more than 50 percent
of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of each corporation,
taking into account the stock ownership of each such person only to the
extent such stock ownership is identical with respect to each such corporation. Generally, the stock ownership rules set forth
above can be met either through direct ownership of stock or through application
of the attribution rules. For purposes of Sections 1561, 1563, and 179,
attribution is controlled by Section 1563(d). With respect to Issue 1 involving Corporations
A, B, C, and D, the question is whether A) BN's stock ownership in Corporations
A and B is attributed to BN's adult children; and B) the adult children's
ownership in Corporations C and D is attributed to BN. The rule regarding attribution between parents
and adult children is set forth at 1563(e)(6)(B). Stock is attributed if
the parent owns (either directly or by attribution) more than 50% of the voting power and value of stock of the corporation
owned by the adult child. BN does not directly own any shares of C and D.
The only source of indirect ownership is application of the 50% rule of
Section 1563(e)(6)(B) itself. Since there is no indirect ownership but for
application of the rule itself, BN has no indirect ownership in C and D.
The same logical process produces the result that the adult children do
not constructively own BN's stock in A and B. Accordingly, there is no common
ownership as between BN's companies and the companies owned by his adult
children. In the absence of such common ownership, Corporations A, B, C,
and D are not part of the same controlled group for purposes of Sections
1561, 1563, and 179. Obviously, A and B are part of the same controlled
group and C and D may be depending on how many parties are involved and
how the ownership is distributed. With respect to Issue 2 involving Corporations
A, B, and F, the question is whether A) BN's stock ownership in Corporations
A and B is attributed to the adult child of BN's second wife; and B) the
child's ownership in Corporation F is attributed to BN. There is no blood relationship between BN and
the adult children of BN's wife, and there is no attribution as between
step-parents and step-children. Accordingly, if any attribution is required
among the parties, it must result from the indirect application of the family
attribution rules with BN's wife. There is no attribution of the F stock
to BN for two reasons. First, apply the same analysis set forth in Issue
1 to determine whether BN's wife constructively owns the stock of F. This
analysis results in the conclusion that she does not constructively own
such stock. Second, even if BN's wife did constructively own the stock of
F, the family attribution rules are applied only one time. In other words,
once the family attribution rules are applied to produce one constructive
owner, the family attribution rules are not applied a second time for purposes
of producing yet another constructive owner. IRC Section 1563(f)(2)(B). Absent attribution to the wife and to BN, Corporations
A, B, and F do not constitute a controlled group under Section 1563. |