Category: Estate & Gift Subject: Generation Skipping Tax Title: Direct Transfers vs. Transfers in Trust IRC Sections: 2611, 2612 Filename: 1105.html Date Produced: 3/97 Copyright 1998, The Tax Resource Group. All rights reserved. Telephone
800-578-3498. Internet: www.taxresourcegroup.com Background Taxpayer died and left her entire estate to her two grand-nieces (the grandchildren
of the taxpayer's sister). The issue is whether the generation skipping
tax (GST) applies. You have suggested that the statutory language that imposes
the GST, IRC Sections 2611 and 2612, utilizes trust language. You have suggested
that because the corpus of the estate passed directly to the heirs (without
any sort of trust arrangement), the GST may not apply. Issue Is a direct transfer (i.e., a transfer not in trust) subject to the GST? Answer Direct transfers are clearly subject to the GST. Discussion IRC Section 2611 provides in pertinent part as follows. For purposes of this chapter, the term "generation-skipping transfer"
means-- 1) a taxable distribution, 2) a taxable termination, AND 3) a direct skip. [Emphasis supplied.] You have suggested that the use of the word and in the IRC Section 2611
definition of the term generation skipping transfer suggests that a transaction
must be a taxable distribution and a taxable termination and a direct skip
in order for the GST to be applicable. A transfer in trust is a prerequisite for a taxable distribution and
a taxable termination. See IRC Sections 2611(a)(1) and 2611(a)(2). The definition
of direct skip does not require a trust. IRC Section 2611(a)(3). You argue that because the decedent's transfer of property to her grand-nieces
was not in trust, the transfer does not qualify as a taxable distribution
or a taxable termination. Because the transfer does not meet all three prongs
of the definition, it is your view that the transfer is not subject to the
GST. I readily agree that the language of Section 2611 is odd and potentially
confusing, even for the Internal Revenue Code; however, I disagree with
the proposition that a transfer in trust is a prerequisite to imposition
of the GST. Despite the very odd and rather annoying way the statute was drafted,
I believe the meaning of Section 2611(a) is clear and unambiguous on its
face. I do not agree that the statute means that a transaction must be a
taxable termination and a taxable distribution and a direct skip in order
for the GST to apply. I believe the statute is clear on its face that the
three categories are each independent alternatives, and if a taxpayer meets
any one of the three, the GST applies. As you pointed out, it is normally the case that if various parts of
a definition are separated by the word and, all the parts must be satisfied
for the definition to be functional. For example, the term acquisition indebtedness
for purposes of qualified residence interest means indebtedness which (I)
is incurred in acquiring...a qualified residence, and (II) is secured by
such residence. I think you would readily agree that it would be impossible
to interpret the two prongs of the above definition as alternative ways
of meeting the definition. It is crystal clear that both requirements must
be met. In contrast, I submit to you that it is quite possible (and quite necessary)
to read the three categories set forth under Section 2611 as alternatives
for qualification rather than components of parts an integrated definition.
In order to clearly produce the interpretation you seek, the statute would
have to read something like the following. For purposes of this Chapter, the term "generation-skipping transfer"
means a transfer which--
A) is a taxable termination, B) is a taxable distribution, and C) is a direct skip. Notice the subtle but very crucial drafting difference: in my example
above, the verb "is" is included within each of the series of
phrases connected by and. In the actual statute, the only verb in the sentence
"means" is not included in the series of phrases connected by
and. The verb "means" occurs before the beginning of the series
of phrases connected by and. Accordingly, the verb "means" applies
equally (and independently) to all the phrases connected by and. ********** If you are still not convinced, I offer the following observations. 1. The GST as it exists today was enacted by The Tax Reform Act of 1986
(P.L. 99-514) The House Committee Report on P.L. 99-514 provides in pertinent
part as follows.
Taxable events.--A generation-skipping transfer tax is imposed on the occurrence
of any one of three events--a taxable distribution, a taxable termination,
or a direct skip. [Emphasis supplied.]
The first two events generally involve transfers that are taxable under
present law. A taxable distribution occurs upon distribution of property
to a generation-skipping beneficiary (e.g., a grandchild). A taxable termination
occurs upon the expiration of an interest in a trust if, after that termination,
all interests in the trust are held by generation-skipping beneficiaries.
Persons holding interests in property are defined to include only those
persons having a current right to property (or income therefrom) or persons
who are current permissible recipients of the property (or income therefrom).
For example, a person having an income interest for life or a holder of
a general power of appointment is treated as having an interest in property.
A direct skip occurs upon an outright transfer for the benefit of a person
at least two generations below the transferor or a transfer of property
to a trust for one or more such beneficiaries. As described in the Overview,
an example of a direct skip is a gift from a grandparent to his or her grandchild. 2. The General Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, prepared by
the Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation provides the following commentary. A generation-skipping transfer tax is imposed on the occurrence of any
one of three events-- taxable distribution, a taxable termination, or a
direct skip. [Emphasis supplied.] 3. Regulation Section 26.2611-1 provides as follows.
A generation-skipping transfer (GST) is an event that is either a direct
skip, a taxable distribution, or a taxable termination. See §26.2612-1
for the definition of these terms. The determination as to whether an event
is a GST is made by reference to the most recent transfer subject to the
estate or gift tax. See §26.2652-1(a)(2) for determining whether a
transfer is subject to Federal estate or gift tax. [Emphasis supplied.] |