Category: Compensation & Benefits; Accounting
Periods & Methods Subject: Signing Bonus Title: Immediate Deductibility vs. Capitalization IRC Sections: 162, 163 Filename: 1169.html Date Produced: 8/96 Copyright 1998, The Tax Resource Group. All rights reserved.
Telephone 800-578-3498. Internet: www.taxresourcegroup.com Law firm plans to hire a top attorney and pay a signing bonus
of somewhere between $50,000 and $250,000. The issue is whether
this payment is immediately deductible or must be capitalized
and amortized over the life of the employment contract. It seems clear that such a payment creates an intangible capital
asset that should be amortized over its useful life. The practice
of paying a signing bonus is of course common in sports. Revenue
Ruling 67-379, 1967-2 CB 127, deals with the issue somewhat indirectly.
Prior to this ruling, there were some very old cases that held
that a signing bonus paid in conjunction with a standard, one-year
baseball contract was wholly deductible in the year paid. There
was never any question as to whether the signing bonus created
a capital assets; rather, the only issue was the period over which
it should be amortized. The old court cases ignored the renewability
feature of the standard baseball contract of the day. The Revenue
Ruling took the position that the renewability should be taken
into account. If the attorney is paid simply for signing the employment contract
and not for anything else, it seems hard to escape capitalization.
I think in order to avoid this result, the taxpayer would need
to do things that would change the economics of the deal. For
example, increase the first year salary or something of that sort. |