Category: Compensation & Employee Benefits; Individuals Subject: SEP Title: SEP's for Older Taxpayers IRC Sections: 408(k), 219 Filename: 1212.html Date Produced: 03/95 Copyright 1998, The Tax Resource Group. All rights reserved. Telephone
800-578-3498. Internet: www.taxresourcegroup.com Issue Is it possible for a self-employed taxpayer, aged 72, to establish an SEP? Answer It is possible to establish an SEP for this taxpayer. Discussion The basic qualifications for an SEP are set forth in Section 408(k) which
provides no maximum participant (or sponsor) age limit. An SEP is basically a special form of IRA in which the employer, or as
in this case the self-employed person, sets up an IRA for each employee.
Because the IRA and SEP rules overlap to a large degree, an SEP is subject
to many of the same rules as an IRA. Section 219 provides a number of rules
regarding deductions of IRA contributions: e.g., the familiar $2,000 limitation,
the active participant rules, and the spousal IRA rules are contained in
Section 219. Section 219(d)(1) prohibits deductible IRA contributions
for participants in excess of age 70-1/2; however, Section 219(b)(2) provides
that all the rules of Section 219 are specifically inapplicable to
SEP's. Proposed regulations issued in 1984 specifically provide that SEP contributions
can be made for participants in excess of 70-1/2 years of age. Proposed
Regulation 1.219-3(b). It seems to me that in the absence of language restricting SEP eligibility
on account of advanced age and given the positive language found in Section
219 and its related proposed regulation, the taxpayer in question can establish
an SEP arrangement. Although the issue was not raised, it may be extremely important to your
decision making process to note that the IRA rules requiring that distributions
begin no later than the year in which a taxpayer attains age 70-1/2 apply
equally to SEP's. In other words, even though it is possible to establish
and contribute to a SEP, it is also necessary to currently distribute monies
from the SEP based on the taxpayer's life expectancy. This may substantially
reduce the attractiveness of establishing the SEP in the first instance.
I caution you to carefully look into this. I assume that the taxpayer wants
an SEP for 1994. I assume further that the taxpayer would like to make a
contribution before April 15, 1995 to count as a deduction for 1994. If
so, the taxpayer could conceivably have had an obligation to make a distribution
before the end of 1994. Query: Can a taxpayer can make distributions post-year end and
have them count for purposes of the prior year? Query: Does Prop. Regs. Section 1.401(a)(9)-1, Q & A, B-2
apply and provide relief in this situation? Query: If Prop. Regs. Section 1.401(a)(9)-1, Q & A, B-2 does
apply and provide relief, would two contributions be required in calendar
1995, one attributable to 1994 and the other for the 1995 year itself? In any event, be aware that failure to make the required distribution
is severely penalized. For more information, see Prop. Regs. Section
1.401(a)(9)-1 and Section 4974. Of course, should you need further assistance,
I would be happy to provide it. |