Category: Tax Returns, Examinations &
IRS Procedures; Accounting Periods & Methods; Corporations Subject: Adoption of Fiscal Year Title: Filing an Invalid Tax Return: Affect on Tax Year IRC Sections: 441 Filename: 1276.html Date Produced: 10/95 Copyright 1998, The Tax Resource Group. All rights reserved.
Telephone 800-578-3498. Internet: www.taxresourcegroup.com Background Taxpayer (TP) filed its initial tax return (Form 1120S) based
on the required calendar year of accounting. The IRS rejected
the return because TP's S election was never filed. Meanwhile,
the IRS has billed the taxpayer for taxes, penalties, and interest
due on the C corporation tax return for the calendar year period. Issue Does filing an invalid return establish TP's tax year? Answer It seems that there is no definitive answer to this question.
I believe it could be argued that TP should be allowed to adopt
the fiscal year tax period it desires. Discussion Reg. Section 1.441-1T(b)(2) provides that a new taxpayer adopts
a taxable year on or before the time prescribed by law (without
extensions) for filing the taxpayer's first return and may adopt,
without prior approval, any taxable year that satisfies the requirements
of Section 441 and the regulations thereunder. Revenue Ruling 57-589 provides that a C corporation which filed
a tax extension (Form 7004) and made the necessary deposit of
taxes due had adopted a taxable year. Revenue Ruling 68-125, 1968-1 CB 189, concerns itself with
a taxpayer who kept its books on a fiscal year basis but failed
to file its first tax return in a timely fashion. The ruling holds
that the taxpayer is not precluded from adopting the fiscal year
on which it keeps its books by virtue of having failed to file
a timely first return. Ordinarily, filing a tax return or even an extension form establishes
the taxpayer's tax year by virtue of Reg. Sec. 1.441-1T(b)(2)
and Rev. Rul. 57-589. In this case, however, the return TP filed
was rejected by the IRS because no S election had been made. It
seems to me that this tax return establishes nothing. It seems
to me that the IRS cannot simultaneously reject a return while
at the same time maintaining that the same return establishes
anything, including TP's tax accounting period. Where a taxpayer does not file a return, the manner in which
the taxpayer keeps his books and records controls the accounting
period for tax purposes. Rev. Rul. 68-125. As I understand it, the IRS has not yet made any substantive
assertions at this point. They have merely billed the taxpayer
based on the mechanical application of the information they have,
i.e., calendar year period of accounting. They have not asserted,
as I understand it, that some other period is not allowable. If my understanding is correct, I suggest filing a C corporation
return based on the desired accounting period. Simultaneously,
write a letter of explanation in response to the penalty notices
and the requests for calendar year returns. The following points
should be made. 1. TP erroneously filed Form 1120S for calendar year 1994.
That return was rejected by IRS for lack of a valid S election. 2. TP maintains its books and records based on a fiscal year
accounting period ended xx/xx/95. Form 1120S was filed based on
a calendar year accounting period solely because of the requirement
of Section 444. In any event, the calendar year filing was rejected.
A rejected tax return establishes nothing, particularly a return
filed in a manner inconsistent with the way the taxpayer maintains
its books and records. 3. Form 1120 for the fiscal period ended xx/xx/95 was timely
filed of yy/yy/95, and a copy pages 1 though 4 of the return is
enclosed for your convenient reference. 4. Since TP has properly adopted a tax accounting period ending
xx/xx and has timely filed Form 1120 on that basis, please take
the following steps. -Please abate all penalties and interest with respect to Form
1120 for the calendar year 1994. -Please update all IRS records to reflect the taxpayer's proper
tax year ended xx/xx.
****** Obviously, the letter may or may not work. However, I think there
is a very good chance of success. If the letter approach fails,
can you see any way TP is worse off for having tried this approach,
other than having incurred additional professional fees for preparation
of a C corporation return the IRS ultimately does not accept? I would be happy to actually draft the necessary letter if
that is desired. |