Category: International; Individuals Subject: U.S. Residency Status, French Citizen Title: Green Card vs. Article 17 of U.S.-France Tax Treaty IRC Sections: 7701(b) Filename: 1311.html Date Produced: 03/94 Copyright 1998, The Tax Resource Group. All rights reserved. Telephone
800-578-3498. Internet: www.taxresourcegroup.com Taxpayer (TP) was at the beginning of 1993 a citizen and resident of
France. He came to the U.S. on 1/3/93 on a J-type visa to teach at a U.S.
university. On 6/16/93, TP received a Green Card. TP has permanently settled
in the U.S. TP otherwise meets in all respects the requirements for exemption
from taxation under Article 17 of the U.S.-France Income Tax Treaty. The
only issue is whether TP's change in status and the award of a Green Card
overrides Article 17. First, there seems to be no black-and-white answer to this question.
Accordingly, there seems to be no answer which is free from doubt. However,
it seems to me that TP should be entitled to Article 17 exemption notwithstanding
his Green Card status for the following reasons. 1. The language of Article 17 seems to be in place specifically to override
what would otherwise be the case for a resident of one state on a more-than-brief
teaching assignment in the other state. Clearly a potential change in residency
status as a result of the time spent in the other state is contemplated
by the Article 17, and the result of that potential change in residency
status in negated by the language of the treaty. 2. The legislative history of §7701(b) under the 1984 Tax Act (which
revamped the rules with respect to resident alien status and created the
so-called "Green Card" test for residency) clearly provides that
§7701(b) is not to override treaty provisions related to residence.
But, see Item 2. below. It is clear that there is considerable exposure with respect to this
conclusion. 1. It could be argued that Article 17 does not contemplate the kind of
overt change of status in which TP engaged. Thus, the entire provision is
contrary to the intent of the contracting parties and should be inapplicable
in TP's case. 2. The legislative history of §7701(b) under the 1984 Tax Act directly
speaks only to the issue of general residency provisions of tax treaties
and conflicts between §7701(b) and those provisions. It seems to me
that §7701(b) and the general residency provisions of the U.S.-France
Treaty Article 3 are not in conflict, i.e., both provisions would treat
TP as a U.S. resident. It could be argued that Congress did not intend for
any other treaty provisions to override §7701(b). 3. There are significant disclosure requirements with respect to treaty-based
provisions. Accordingly, there is a significant possibility of IRS scrutiny
in this matter. This is particularly so if TP's teaching income has been
reported on Form W-2. |