Category: International; Deductions & Credits;
Individuals; Estate & Gift Subject: Interest Paid to Foreign Lender/Gifts by Nonresidents Title: Various Issues IRC Sections: 102, 267(a)(3), 1442, 1441, 2501(a)(2) Filename: 1362.html Date Produced: 06/93 Copyright 1998, The Tax Resource Group. All rights reserved. Telephone
800-578-3498. Internet: www.taxresourcegroup.com Facts Taxpayers (TP's) are husband and wife, both of whom are resident aliens
for U.S. tax purposes. TP's have filed joint income tax returns in the
past. Wife resides in California. Although Husband has a U.S. work permit
(a "green card"), he lives and works in Hong Kong. TP's own a residence in California which is encumbered by a mortgage
of approximately $430,000. TP's also own California rental property which
is encumbered by a mortgage of approximately $130,000. In addition, TP's
have personal loans of approximately $60,000. Thus in total, TP's have
approximately $620,000 of indebtedness. TP's are contemplating the following ways of either reducing the amount
or the carrying costs of the indebtedness. 1. Refinance the debt through a foreign financial institution in order
to get a lower rate. 2. Refinance the debt through a foreign individual in order to get a
lower rate.
3. Repay the indebtedness in whole or in part with funds obtained as a
gift from Husband's father, a citizen and resident of Hong Kong. Issues 1. If the indebtedness is refinanced with a foreign financial institution
or individual, will interest paid on the loans be deductible by TP's for
U.S. tax purposes? 2. If the indebtedness is refinanced with a foreign financial institution
or individual, will interest paid on the loans be subject to U.S. withholdings? 3. What are the U.S. gift and income tax consequences to TP's and Father
if Father makes a cash gift of $620,000 to TP's? 4. What are the U.S. gift and income tax consequences to TP's if Father
loans $620,000 to TP's at arm's-length rates and terms and subsequently
forgives principal and unpaid interest on such loans? Findings 1. There is nothing to restrict U.S. deductibility of interest paid
by a cash basis individual taxpayer to a foreign lender solely because of
the lender's situs. The same is true whether the lender is an individual
or a financial institution. It is important to note that all the normal
restrictions and requirements for deductibility of interest still must be
met irrespective of the situs of the lender. 2. U.S. income tax withholding at the rate of 30% (or lower if established
by treaty) should generally apply to interest payments made either to a
foreign financial institution or foreign individual. 3. Father can make a cash gift of any amount to TP's without any U.S.
gift or income tax consequences. Gifts of intangibles by nonresident aliens
are specifically exempt from U.S. gift tax. Gifts are nontaxable to recipients
under §102. 4. Under the same reasoning as stated in Finding 3, above, gratuitous
forgiveness of principal and unpaid interest on loans from Father should
not give rise to any U.S. gift or income tax consequences for either Father
or TP. Discussion Issue 1 There is no indication in the tax literature that interest payments are
restricted as to deductibility simply by virtue of being made to a foreign
lender. There are a number of provisions that speak to interest deductions
related to foreign loans; however, these provisions deal with the timing
of the deduction for accrued but unpaid interest owed to a related foreign
lender (§267(a)(3)) or with the deductions of corporate taxpayers §163(j)).
Since TP's are cash basis individuals who will pay interest to a foreign
lender, there does not appear to be any restrictions on deductibility resulting
solely from the lender's foreign situs. It is important to emphasize that all other requirements and restrictions
on the deductibility of interest payments still exist notwithstanding the
situs of the lender. These requirements and restrictions include but are
not limited to: 1. the nondeductibility of consumer interest; 2. the requirements for deductibility of home mortgage interest; 3. passive loss restrictions related to the rental house; 4. the interest tracing regulations; and 5. whether debt between related parties is in fact bona fide debt. Issue 2 §§1442 and/or 1441 clearly require U.S. income tax withholding
on payments of interest made to nonresident aliens or foreign corporations.
If the loan were made by a non-U.S. person and the interest from the loan
were effectively connected with that person's U.S. trade or business, then
withholding would not required provided that the lender is able to produce
appropriate exemption certificates. Otherwise, withholding is clearly necessary. The normal rate of withholding is 30% unless a lower rate is established
by treaty. Given the relationship TP's have with Hong Kong, I assume that
a Hong Kong financial institution or individual would be the most likely
source for a loan of this type. Hong Kong is not a party to an income tax
treaty with the United States; accordingly, withholding at the general rate
of 30% would be required on interest paid to a Hong Kong financial institution
or individual. Issue 3 Under §2501(a)(2), U.S. gift tax does not apply to gifts of intangible
property made by a person who is neither a citizen nor a resident of the
United States. Accordingly, Father can make a cash gift to TP's without
incurring U.S. gift taxes. It should be noted that gifts of U.S. situs
tangible property made by nonresident aliens are subject to gift tax. There
are a number of cases in which taxpayers have unsuccessfully attempted to
avoid U.S. gift taxes on transfers of U.S. tangible property by restructuring
the gifts as a transfer of intangible property. For example, in Davies
v. Comr., 40 T.C. 525 (1963), the taxpayer, a resident of the U.K., gave
cash to his son. The son immediately returned the cash to his father as
a down payment on real property in Hawaii. The court held that the transaction
was simply a disguised means of transferring the realty and thus was subject
to U.S. gift tax. I urge you to review all the facts surrounding TP's acquisition
and ownership of the home and the rental dwelling in order to evaluate whether
there is exposure based on TP's facts to a recharacterization of a cash
gift from Father. Under §102, gifts to not give rise to taxable income to the donee.
Accordingly, TP's are not subject to tax on a bona fide cash gift of any
amount from Father. Issue 4 Based on the same reasoning as set forth above, Father's forgiveness of
principal and unpaid interest should not give rise to gift tax to Father
or cancellation of indebtedness income to TP's. |